How? Player 1’s actions were either a kickable mistake or nothing serious, he just slightly entered the other lane. He got banned because Player 2 didn’t stop, even though it was clearly visible that a collision would happen if he kept moving.
So, if Player 2 had stopped or avoided the collision, the accident wouldn’t have happened in the first place. It’s a paradox
Yeah, but only for that specific case. It doesn't cover the pattern I'm suggesting.
I'm 100% sure they blame Player 1 and don't consider Player 2's actions in this pattern. If I point that out, I'm afraid they’ll ban me from the feedback system for abuse.
Even though Player 1 got banned because Player 2 collided with him. despite the fact that Player 2 could have technically stopped, knowing that if he kept moving while Player 1 was turning, a collision would happen.
So that’s why I made this suggestion to recognize this pattern or paradox and give both of them a kick instead.