You haven't lost anything. Imagine that before this anonymization change you received a ban, justified or not. During the game you see the name of the staff member who banned you and you want to appeal your ban. Your primary course of action is to send an appeal, the necessary information about your ban and the evaluation of your appeal will be done at this stage, and 95% of the time the situation will be resolved without even sending a secondary message. With the remaining 5% chance, if your appeal was not resolved at the first stage, you can open a feedback about your ban and the suspicion about the issue will be completely resolved at this stage. Now go back to the beginning of this scenario and read it again, assuming you do not know the name of the staff member who banned you. Has anything changed? No. Did you need the name of the staff member in this scenario ? No. So what is the purpose of your insistence on this subject?