Why not reducing the Active bans expires after 6 months of the ban

[aviation the best]

Hello I have a suggestion to reduce the active bans instead of 12 months it goes away after 6 months of the ban i think it would be a great idea because 12 months is too long.

[Hawkmusen]

I disagree because I think the less it is reduced the more chaos and bans will increase.

[3749771]

I don't agree with your suggestion. Because if the active ban period is reduced, trolling users or bad manners users increase, so I think 12 months is suitable for now.

[Interstate Nomad]

I find it difficult to comprehend what benefit such a decision would bring to the community.

[Guest]

If the situation you described had taken place, the rule of "§2.8 - How bans are issued" would have to be changed mathematically, and it would have caused mixed results depending on the expiration of the bans. Therefore, I don't support your suggestion to change the current punishment system.

 

Kind Regards.

[[G-T-R]GrayWolf]

They already remove the permanent ban don't think so don't need to lower ban expiry date can't agree with you.

[FernandoCR [ESP]]

No need, IMO. Don't get banned and you won't need to worry about expiration or deactivation dates. Specially if one wants to join the staff, which is (or should be) the best reason to be extra-careful.

["RICKY"]

1 hour ago, FernandoCR [ESP] said:

Não há necessidade, IMO. Não seja banido e não precisará se preocupar com datas de expiração ou desativação. Especialmente se alguém quiser entrar para a equipe, que é (ou deveria ser) o melhor motivo para ser extremamente cuidadoso.

I fully agree with you. 

[Yarkoon]

If a person is banned for 12 months, then it's not just like that. So why is it necessary to reduce the effect of the ban.

In 12 months, a person must understand all his mistakes.

[Donii.]

I disagree with this suggestion purely on the basis that the TruckersMP rules aren't difficult to follow. By reducing the active ban timeframe it'll allow for more chaos from those that intend on breaking the rules to ruin other players' experience.

[Guest]

This will only make TMP messier

[Aura.]

It should stay at 12 months for a better environment

[Tσmmy]

Hello,

 

The human mind is a very strange concept. I think it is easier to take an action by thinking of months than to think of years. As a result, people easily accept that a time spanning months will pass. But when the situation covers the year, things change. I think the existence of the "1 year" limit instead of the "6 months" limit puts more psychological pressure on the drivers and people especially feel more responsible for it. 

[Mavi~]

It will not be a problem as long as you do not behave in a way that requires banning. Reducing this duration may make players more reckless about being banned.

[Leon Baker]

Hello @aviation the best,

 

Thanks for the suggestion!

 

Every user has 3 chances before the punishment history is taken into account when the next ban is issued, so we see 12 months as an optimal solution. Reducing the punishment history cooldown period to 6 months will not bring any benefits but only encourage users to worry less about the amount of the active bans they have which will lead to more rule violations. That is definitely not something we would be happy to see, nor the community would be happy about that, so we will not be proceeding with this suggestion at this time. Thanks for understanding!

 

Sincerely,

Leon Baker

Community Manager

 

// Rejected