TrademarkGamer
Everything posted by TrademarkGamer
-
If the admin sees it as an accident, it's more than likely the report will get declined and you will stay unbanned. If, however, the admin thinks that the speed that you were going was reckless, then this may result in a ban.
-
I haven't actually played the 1.32 beta but it looks like it will push the simulation factor of the game up tenfold. Also, I see this "Hot Topic" idea going far. Good work!
-
After changing BETA for MP, SP not working anymore
TrademarkGamer replied to Zombiekey350's question in Unsolved Topics
there should be a folder called "profiles(1.30.2.9s).bak" in your Euro Truck Simulator 2 folder. There will be a save folder in there which you should put into the save folder, you should then be able to play MP with the profile. Here is a gif which shows what to do. https://gyazo.com/86b09e2cd0f7d086ad0fc2426237dd6b -
That menu is how reports get sent to admins. whether you think they look at the reports is irrelevant
-
Hi there, Due to the game time being syncronised on the server, loads are often delivered late as you're single player economy will not be the same as the server economy. As long as you complete a load in Multiplayer in one go, there shouldn't be a problem with it being late.
-
Agree. Making a public statement was just inviting a debate. I've seen the PM say there is no reason for public interest so, there is no reason for this topic
-
I never said I don't repect their opinion. Respect and disagreement are two different things.
-
""bug abusing"
-
§2.1 - Hacking/Bug abusing - PERMANENT BAN Using any kind of tool to change gameplay, including but not limited to using the in-game console, trainers or cheat engine in order to bypass the speeding limiter, to jump hack, no collision hack or anything similar.
-
As I editied in my original post, you've made it public interest by posting a whole topic about it.
-
I, personally, couldn't care less who got banned and who didn't get banned. My main point is that there is a simple soloution to a simple problem which could stop all of this. ^Also, the fact that a member of the team has posted a public statement about it means that you've made it public interest.
-
It's called passion. We know the mod could become far better than it is right now, it's just a shame that the team isn't being transparrent.
-
What is the reason for not disclosing that information though? I see no reason to no post things such as the ban appeals with any personal information blured. I can say with absoloute certainty realeasing this would gain the respect of a large portion of the community. As I said eariler, the TMP team is an online mod not a government agency or something like that. Just saying we made the ISP not to disclose that info isn't going to wash with a lot of the community.
-
If there is personal information a simple photo edit can blur that out. The ISP was made by the TMP team and can be breached by the TMP team to re gain the community's respect. Simply saying there's an ISP is not good enough, it's an online mod, not a government organisation
-
Respect is earned, not just given by default
-
It's a shame because simply releasing the details would gain the respect of a large portion of the community. TMP takes itself far too seriously these days to do that these days.
-
The Feedback is Working ?
TrademarkGamer replied to Bertholdt[NL-DE-FR-MA]'s question in Solved Topics
There are a large amount of feeback tickets and only around 10 people to handle them all as upper staff are the only people permitted to reply to them. An answer will be given, however long it may take. -
The whole rejecting something because it has been suggested before is a bit ridiculous. Surely if enough time has passed from the original suggestion, mods could pass it to the relevant people for another look at it. (I would open a feedback, but have one open on a different issue)
- Show previous comments 4 more
-
-
-
@Killua // Ireland ^_^ Because the reason they used for suggesting at the first time was not convincing. The moderator rejected the whole idea without giving a proper explanation. However, we suggest the same idea from a different perspective, they should try to re-think about this instead of checking whether the suggestion is suggested before or not. Maybe TMP didn't really this suggestion at that time but now it should be needed. The priority of handling suggestion is completely non-sense. That's why I said @TrademarkGamer has a point here.
Or we could destroy the suggest system easily by using bad reason, to letting them reject our suggestions. So no one could use a better reason to suggest the same thing again (even if it is needed). Rejected before, search before posting. Being a moderator seems to be pretty easy here. I am not tended to be so mean here but this is a real problem if the moderators don't think the current method of handling suggestions is a problem.
-
First time England has reached the semi finals in my lifetime. We've played a hell of a game!
-
One month till I'm 18. Can't wait!
-
So, for my final major project at school I made a fictional radio station for TMP. go check it out if you like http://benedmonds.co.uk/fmp
-
Oh Damn, yesterday was my 3 year forum anniversary. Time files!
-
Does this not defeat the purpose of the challlenge?
-
Surely the roadworks defeats the point in it being a challenge?
-
-
@iHobbit That wasn't the point I was making. Even if there is traffic, it defeats the point of the challenge.
-
-
![[VIVΛ HH] KЯΛVΛTIΞ](https://forum.truckersmp.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/imported-photo-2089.thumb.png.23fb09f069ad19b607f697be8611ba7c.png)
![[MCG] Kien Giang](https://forum.truckersmp.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/imported-photo-98211.thumb.jpeg.db1883aca6314f9e0114ca932bf1d1c3.jpeg)
