MrBladex Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Suggestion Description: So, my idea is that when someone breaks a small rule, like colliding with someone else, they should get a warning first. If they break another rule or collide again, they get a second warning. After the second warning, if they mess up again, they get banned. But for really bad stuff like trolling or hacking, there should be an instant ban with no warnings. Why it should be added: This way, people get a second chance, but serious rule-breakers are still dealt with quickly. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatSunnyGuy Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 The idea i good, but then it means that the mods are going to highlight on what's minor and what's major for rule breaking. Also, it depends on what really happens. If they collided with truck(s), which causes the entire road to back up or if you drove the wrong way which causes you to collide with another truck and cause others rage, or trying to do a U-turn on a road when there's traffic behind you, and you are taking too long to do it resulting them to report you, that really depends on the mods to consider a warning or a ban. It really comes down to what is REALLY minor and what is very major depending on the crime they committed. Also, most people who they reported would likely to have an answer on if they have been banned or not. Maybe some would actually fight to get their reports to be successful. There are all sorts of people who drive trucks (and cars) and either they are new or experienced, they would not stand on a collision and the perpetrator getting away with it. It is a thought but I like the idea. If it goes on hold, I think it depends on the mods to highlight what they will give a warning to and what no OR on discretion. Anyway, good thought! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast-rider Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 Isn´t that the purpose of kicks and teleport to repair (with an without kick)? To have a warning like "Don´t do this again. You can be punished further if you do this repeatedly". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatSunnyGuy Posted September 19 Share Posted September 19 9 minutes ago, Fast-rider said: Isn´t that the purpose of kicks and teleport to repair (with a without kick)? To have a warning like "Don´t do this again. You can be punished further if you do this repeatedly". The kick is mostly is a warning (most likely) and pretty much people will constantly ask you to f7 to teleport to a service station but still you will be reported and mods (with discretion) might ban you or say no and their reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBladex Posted September 19 Author Share Posted September 19 You can only issue kicks if the reported player is currently in the game. However, if the player is offline, they can receive a warning. When they rejoin a server, a message will notify them of their warning, for example: (You have received 1 out of 2 warnings because of [the broken rule]). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatSunnyGuy Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 Again, it depends on what they have done, MAJOR or MINOR. If someone blocked the road, and it leads to a big traffic jam (which can happen) to me that would be a ban. If they crashed into another driver, and it causes both to f7, that is a ban. If the driver decided to use racial slurs etc, that is a ban. And there is a lot more on what is a ban and probably maybe warnings and kicks (being 2 warnings is enough). Probably... Either way, for me, if someone did something bad, I would hope they have been reported and banned. There's been times when I knew where people crashed into them or overtook them when they did need to do. Heck, there were two trucks who purposely crashed into me and made it hard for me to drive. If I had a recording of it, I would send it as a report, and it would be a BAN. Simple as that. Hence, why banning is just simple and easy. Giving people warnings may help those who could not do it again, but there are a few people who feel lucky and will end up doing it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuX. Posted September 20 Share Posted September 20 On 9/14/2024 at 1:18 AM, MrBladex said: If they break another rule or collide again, they get a second warning. After the second warning, if they mess up again, they get banned. So basically just let them ruin the experience for others and ban them after X amount of warnings. With the amount of people that get banned/kicked daily, warnings would be detrimental. Keep it the way it is, you mess up you get banned or kicked if you're lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBladex Posted September 22 Author Share Posted September 22 That is a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatSunnyGuy Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 And again, people want to see results if someone has done something MAJOR that deserved to be banned. Hence why it works... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahmet16 Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 On 14.09.2024 at 02:18, MrBladex said: Öneri Açıklaması: Yani, fikrim şu ki birisi küçük bir kuralı çiğnediğinde, örneğin başka biriyle çarpıştığında, önce bir uyarı almalı. Başka bir kuralı çiğnerlerse veya tekrar çarpışırlarsa, ikinci bir uyarı alırlar. İkinci uyarıdan sonra, tekrar hata yaparlarsa, yasaklanırlar. Ama trolleme veya bilgisayar korsanlığı gibi gerçekten kötü şeyler için hiçbir uyarı yapılmadan anında yasaklama yapılmalı. Neden eklenmeli: Bu şekilde, insanlara ikinci bir şans verilir, ancak ciddi kural ihlalleri yine de hızlı bir şekilde halledilir. There are constant accidents in TMP, some accidents caused by conscious reasons, some accidents caused by unconscious and unwilling situations. Someone else may hit you or cause you to have an accident. Setting up an automatic ban system for all these will cause a lot of unfair bans and will cause users to experience pressure and stress. For this reason, I cannot agree with your suggestion. In addition, it is very difficult to optimize such a system from a technical perspective and will put a serious load on the servers. Maybe instead, if the same user is reported +50 times in 1 hour for similar reasons, the user's login can be suspended for 3 hours. But this system can be abused by some user groups. For this reason, authorized personnel control will always be a more effective solution in case of a ban or similar situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niuro Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 This is never going in and I will tell you why - normal folk don't and can't stand trolls. If this is to pass, you will be seeing plenty less people on the servers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Хидара Posted September 27 Share Posted September 27 as I know, moderators do not punish minor violations. So, I'm against it Hidara Veteran Driver VIII | Member since: 31 Dec 2015 23:30 UTC TruckersMP ID: 751173 Languages: Russian, English, Japanese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBladex Posted September 29 Author Share Posted September 29 If a Player is Offline and he would Normally get Kicked, he could get a warning, that would make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoahTheGamer Posted October 21 Share Posted October 21 i have to agree one this with faster rider sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddoghalo Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 I agree, had my first accident merging onto a busy freeway, truck tried to slow down but we bumped. Got 1 week ban, rejected ban appeal twice, missed Halloween one day event. Total buzz kill. No ban history, literal accident. I think bans are the only form of action taken and it effects both bad actors and those who mean no harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Community Manager mth. Posted October 29 Community Manager Share Posted October 29 Hello @MrBladex, Thank you for your suggestion! Game Moderators already issue warnings or kicks for minor offenses. We have clear guidelines that help moderators determine when to warn, kick, or ban, taking various factors into account. All players are expected to follow the rules, and we assume they understand not to push boundaries or test the limits. Therefore, we do not see the need to implement your idea and will decline it. Thanks for your understanding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Community Manager mth. Posted October 29 Community Manager Share Posted October 29 // Rejected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts