FernandoCR [ESP]

Por procesador y memoria, está bien, pero esa GPU es inferior en rendimiento a la mínima recomendada (GTX660), por lo tanto es normal que a nivel gráfico lo notes. Tendrás que reducir las opciones para que TMP vaya más o menos bien e incluso más si tienes planeado moverte en las zonas con gran cantidad de jugadores.

^^ You could say that, yes. But it's what the majority of the players wanted. So it's what the TMP staff decided to give them. The minority can use empty servers, drive on empty roads or quit TMP and use single player. This has been the official answer for a long time now.

No need. The solution is simple and has been posted lots of times, referencing this quarry road or the C-D one in the base map: You don't like the conditions on that road, drive somewhere else...

You can always instruct the convoy participants via text, although it's not the best idea (I'm against texting while driving), but being the only option you have and that everyone (or almost) is doing it most of the time, it should be OK, as long as you are cautious while texting.

I don't like those people who only play to drive up and down the same road recording and reporting. But if you are worried about them, the solution is simple: drive somewhere else, there's a lot of map and other servers. When someone complains about the toxic players who are continuously breaking the rules on the C-D road, that's what everyone else give them: "Go away from the C-D area". I can see how this "suggestion" could be helpful to lower the "rec/rep" toxicity, but I also see that it would be even more helpful to raise the "F*** the rules" toxicity. And as a joke, it's not bad, actually (December 28th is in Latin countries like "April fools day" in other countries).

So, from what I understand, it would be needed to add a new server exclusively for this map, same as it happens with Promods. I doubt that it's worth it to spend time and resources opening a server unless lots of people would be willing to use it on a daily basis. And I doubt that many TMP players would want to do this.

You placed the mod in the wrong folder. The way you put it, it will work in single player but not in TMP. For it to work in TMP, it needs to be stored in \Documents\ETS2MP\mod or \Documents\ATSMP\mod. You can simply copy/paste from the current location to the TMP one and then you can use it both when you play in TMP and when you play single.

There are no drivable cars in ETS2 or ATS, so I can't see how this suggestion could be SCS related. The Scout and the alternating vehicles are done and maintained by TruckersMP staff, it's up to them to tweak these vehicles as deemed necessary.

^^^^ I doubt that bot vehicles would have a name/tag on top of them, so it would be easy enough to distinguish if the vehicle one is seeing is a player or a bot. But that's irrelevant. It's been years since TMP stated that they were working on this, they even got it to work, to a limited extent, in a beta test. And nothing since then, other than some news about a "framework" that might make things easier to have bot traffic implemented. I find it unlikely that TMP will ever have this feature.

It would be cool, no doubt. But seeing that it's been more than 8 years and nothing has been done/mentioned about it... I doubt that this will ever happen.

The message itself explains it. There's a banned account that the system has detected as owned by you, so you are not allowed to use a second account to keep playing, as long as the first one remains banned. The solution is also given: "If you believe this is an error please contact through our feedback system". You can see info on how to send a feedback ticket here: https://truckersmp.com/knowledge-base/article/25 The ticket should be sent to Game Moderation Management.

Another difference: IRL and in any population group most people "play by the rules" and there's only a small number of rule breakers, in comparison. TruckersMP's population is not like that, and the C-D area in TruckersMP is the exact opposite of that. You would need such amount of "police officers" that the traffic would probably become twice as much as it is now. Situation would become even worse. And many of the offenders would just see it as a new GTA experience in TMP, let's escape from the law... I can't stop being amazed with the amount of "suggestions" that try to improve a place in TruckersMP that most players don't want to have improved. It's been said many times: If TMP decided to "erase" the C-D road from the map, the problems there would not be solved. They'd just be moved to some other road in the map. And then what? Another lot of suggestions to "improve" that new area? When the solution has already been provided, even by staff members? "If you don't like how things are there, drive somewhere else".

No one would be able to greet you if they are moving. And if they are stopped, they should understand that you can't text back if you're moving. You can always flash your lights or give a short honk to greet back, no need to type anything.

Problem is that "We" in this suggestion is maybe some dozens of players. Versus thousands of GTA/NFS style fans that don't need and most importantly, don't want anything that resembles simulation. I doubt that TMP would open a new server and the existing ones... The only suitable for a change would be Arcade, as it is the least used one. But if this server were changed, surely there would be lots of complaints, even from people who never used it and would never use it, asking to bring it back. You can see disagreement in this same topic (and in many others alike) from someone who would still have all other servers to play as they want, but still reject the mere idea of a Hard simulation server that they could simply ignore. Besides, TMP would probably say that they don't need and don't want such a server. It would make things more difficult to handle and for just (best case scenario) 200-300 players? No way.

Best way to do WoT events like this is: You go to one city in the area, pick a job to a different one that meets the distance requirement, do the job. Then you teleport to a different city with fast travel, pick a new job. This way, with 15 jobs you can visit 30 different cities and complete the personal goal easily.

AFAIK, all trucks in both ETS2 and ATS are equipped with a CB radio. When driving with keyboard, the push-to-talk is just pushing a different key and most people have at least 8 fingers (and 2 thumbs). When driving with controller or wheel, the push-to-talk can be set to a button, using the device's software or some external apps, so no need to go for the keyboard when you want to use it. CB chaos can be avoided in convoys by switching to any channels other than 19. This is the way to communicate when one is driving, so you don't need to let go of the steering wheel or stop looking at what's ahead of your vehicle. Just my opinion, of course.

I'm 100% against texting while driving, so I can only support this suggestion if it were made so it can only be used when the vehicle is fully stopped. Even if it's just copy/paste from a pre-saved list of messages in some notepad embedded in the game, it's still a moment of distraction from driving.

Not only it is dangerous, it's also forbidden in lots of countries. In Spain, you are not allowed to use the GPS or any other devices while driving, you are not even allowed to pick a bottle of water to take a sip. You are thirsty, you have to stop, you want to cahge your route in the navigation system, you have to stop, the cell phone rings, either you use a hands-free system or you have to stop (or ignore the call). And so on.

Ping depends on the distance, but this distance can be affected by how each ISP routes their traffic towards other providers/servers. Imagine that your ISP could be using a terrestrial route to reach European servers and your friend's ISP could be using submarine cable. This could make your route to a certain server longer in fact, even if your location is closer to that server than your friend's. By what you describe about your connection, I'd say that there's nothing you can do to lower the ping to TMP servers. Other than change to a different ISP, which could (or not) have a different routing, but I wouldn't gamble on that, things could improve, true, but they could get worse too. And like others have said, 150 ms is a perfectly fine ping to play in TruckersMP. As long as the connection is stable (no packet loss and very low or no jitter).

AFAIK, emergency braking and adaptive cruise control only works with bot traffic and/or static obstacles. Even in the game's Convoy mode these features don't work with other players' vehicles. So until SCS can make them work, I find it unlikely that TMP can/will even try.

You can have as many accounts as you want and you can use any of them. As long as NONE of those accounts is banned. If you get banned in one account, you won't be able to join the server with any other accounts, because it will (supposedly) detect that you are trying to ban evade and an auto-kick will be triggered.

It's not your computer that needs upgrading, it's your home internet connection. Not just for roaming the web, but for any online games you may play with your PC, 1 Mbps is simply ridiculous in 2023...

A computer with a 1 Mbps connection to the internet sounds like... From more than 20 years ago, when ADSL tech started to become popular... I used to have a 33.6 Kbps connection. In 1998...

For each report sent in-game, a "demo" is saved containing data that allows the GM to "recreate" the incident. When (if) the report is claimed, the GM will use these data to watch what happened, like a video, but they can change the POV in order to watch the incident from different angles, distances, etc. This is precisely why these reports time out and are automatically deleted. The server can only store up to a certain amount of data, like any computer. When that maximum is reached, either you remove the oldest data so new data can be stored or you simply can't store anything else. Could this be solved? Sure, by adding more storage to the server. But how much? Would it be worth it, since storage isn't precisely free? And if they did this, who's to say that in-game reports wouldn't take days/weeks to be solved? The current overload problem in the web reporting system would be happening in the in-game system too.

The difference is that those mods charge for an specific item that is added to the game, TruckersMP would be charging their users for playing ETS2/ATS differently. I have no idea about how these things work, but I've read lots of times from TMP staff that the only way they can "make money" is through donations (Patreon, currently) and that they can never become a paid service because of legal reasons.