LUPO (ITA)
Posts posted by LUPO (ITA)
-
-
Hello @Melehat,
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this suggestion.
I did not understand what you mean but in case you ask to kick a player who exceeds 110 km / h in the server, I tell you that it is not always for reasons of hackers in speed.
Sometimes there are routes with some descents and if you maintain the speed of 110 km / h, at the time you make the descent, the speed could exceed and reach for example 112 km / h. But it's not hacker. It is simply the road. Uphill you lower the speed.
Anyway let me know what you meant precisely.
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
Hello @Kovácssss,
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this suggestion and welcome on the forum if you are new here.
About your idea, I can tell you that I agree and I think it would be very important to be able to decrease traffic on the C-D road, especially even during rush hours. Often the passage of the train takes place and long queues form resulting in increased traffic.
In the hope that something may change in the future to make the game even better, I wish you good luck.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, Somehow Lucky said:
That is exactly what my Revamp CD suggestion is. Make it safer and to be able to accommodate 3500 players better. I just don't know why Staff just don't want to do this.
Additionally, how will the 5 bans be noticed? Is it your 5th active ban or the 5th ban issued from now?
I think the same thing. It would certainly be safer and even less tedious than standing in queues in a lane near the closed level crossing when the train passes. With an extra lane, traffic at a standstill would become less than now.
For bans there would be two possibilities:
One possibility is that of active bans, after reaching 5 active bans the player is banned permanently at the 5th ban.
But this can be disadvantageous because if a person never gets to the 5th active ban because older bans become inactive, that the person is permanently banned will never happen.
For example, a player has 4 active bans, tomorrow an active ban expires and becomes inactive. The next day he commits a new violation and returns to have 4 active bans. In the meantime, however, there would have been 5 bans (with the ban now passed inactive).
In my opinion the complete list of bans (active and inactive) would be fairer. Even if they are inactive bans, they are to be considered violations committed in the past.
What do you think?
-
2 hours ago, Nan sheng-TMP said:
What is the purpose of being banned if you can still play the game
?What is the usePlease just ask you to vote without commenting if it is not really necessary. I would like to make it clear that I am also against it. Thanks.
-
3 minutes ago, Rosso. said:
Close the game and turn off your pc,try it
Okey, thank you!
-
1
-
-
21 minutes ago, Rosso. said:
Hello @ROMANISTA [ITA],
Thanks for creating this topic and making TruckersMP in a Better place.
I rarely load a quicksave when I drive,I always make F7 or /disconnect and I go to the service if I'm near C-D area. I never caused traffic jams for my mistakes or engine problems, I do F7 or in the worst case If I'm too tired and pissed off I quit by ALT+F4
But driving following traffic and road rules is quite impossible to make a crash...who makes crash is always who don't follow the road rules and drive like an idiot.
Kind Regards,
Rosso. | Aurora Driver.
Hello @Rosso.,
Thank you for your answer.
What exactly is the "ALT + F4" command for? Just out of curiosity.
Thanks.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
8 minutes ago, SvartWolf said:
Hello @ROMANISTA [ITA],
In my personal opinion, having a server dedicated exclusively to banned players on TruckersMP would be a bad idea for several reasons. While it may seem like a solution to allow banned players to continue playing without disrupting other users, there are significant drawbacks to implementing such a server.
---
- Undermining the Purpose of a Ban: A ban is typically imposed as a consequence for violating the rules and regulations of a platform. It serves as a deterrent and a disciplinary measure to maintain a healthy and fair gaming environment. Creating a separate server for banned players contradicts the purpose of the ban and dilutes its effectiveness.
- Encouraging Toxic Behavior: Allowing banned players to access a dedicated server can foster a toxic and negative part of the community. Such players may feel encouraged to engage in further misconduct, especially if they are still allowed access to an exclusive server for the duration of their ban. Thus potentially leading to an environment that in some cases encourages reckless driving, hacking, and other forms of rule breaches.
- Negative Impact on Community Perception: The existence of a server exclusively for banned players could harm the overall perception and reputation of TruckersMP. It may lead to public scrutiny, criticism, and reduced trust from the community and potential new players. The perception of an environment that is more lenient towards rule-breaking and overall misconduct could deter genuine players from engaging with the platform.
---
That being said, rather than creating a separate server for banned players, it is generally more effective for TruckersMP to focus on maintaining the current fair and consistent enforcement of rules, educating players about appropriate behavior, and providing opportunities for banned players to learn from their mistakes. These efforts contribute to a healthier gaming community and can ensure that the platform remains enjoyable for everyone involved.
Kind regards,
SvartWolf
TruckersMP Game ModeratorHello @SvartWolf,
Thank you for your answer.
I want to clarify that I fully agree with you and I think exactly like you. Also in my opinion it would be better not to use a server dedicated only to people who are banned.
It's not that I would want such a server, also because I like to follow the rules in the game without violations.
I opened this topic ONLY to know the opinions of other players in this forum on what they think.
But my answer is NO for a server of players banned.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
16 minutes ago, Kid Fabi said:What's the purpose of getting banned if you could still play the game?
I agree. But I would like to know from the community of this forum, what they think about it and whether or not others would like a server as I have described. I don't want this server for players banned.
-
Hello!
In my opinion, there are many players who are banned on the game and do you agree to open a server for banned players? (up to 3 months ban).
If a player will be permanently banned, will not be able to access any server (so not even this server that I am saying).
The rules for the new server can be as follows:
1) No collisions for the entire map.
2) No speed limits.
I would like to say that I am against it, but I would like to know the opinions of others. Vote yes or no.
Add a comment ONLY if necessary.
Tell me your opinion.
Thank you.
Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
Hello @Rosso.,
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this topic.
I fully agree with you. I definitely think that at the 5th ban, a player should be banned permanently because otherwise, after 3 months of ban, he will continue to commit violations.
It would be useless to ban only 3 months at most for violations, because once the ban period expires, the player can re-enter the game and be dangerous in the same way towards other players.
If a person has driven badly and is a player with 5 bans, it means that he can also have the 6th ban. Once I found myself reporting a player and he had already had 5 bans. With my report, he was banned the 6th time.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
Hello @Onur26[TR],
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this idea.
I want to tell you right away that I fully agree. It's not fair to turn off an entire chat because of some spamming players.
There should be a command to disable the chat of that individual player and also the possibility to reactivate it in the future, if you want to reactivate the chat with that player.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
On 6/26/2023 at 5:39 PM, TimeTimes said:
This is where 368 was in the wrong. They had plenty of time to see you abort the overtake and could have easily braked on time to let you back in safely. However, they did not even slow down a little bit and actually wanted to overtake 787 as you can see them moving into the other lane slightly before changing their mind. Their actions ultimately caused a dangerous situation.
Yes @TimeTimes, I totally agree with you.
Why accelerate to overtake on the right when you see that another player puts the arrow to return? it does not make sense. The player ID 368 would have created more danger for a collision.
-
2 hours ago, blabberbeak said:
How did you determine that the following truck driver accelerated his vehicle?
At 0.21 in the video, the trucker behind him was a long way off and then accelerated to pass him. I think if he had kept the same speed, he could have gotten back on his lane. Did you know that according to European road laws, it is absolutely forbidden to overtake from the right? Plus... he also had the arrow on to get back into the lane. Or perhaps you mean that the player with ID 368 was right to outrun him?
The player with ID 368 could have stayed behind.
I also think it is need to accelerate to overtake, right?
Personally, if I had been in player ID 368's place, I would have slowed down instead of overtaking him.
-
Hello @Almira xeltz.,
First of all thank you for taking the time to ask this question.
In my opinion, first of all it is wrong to travel at a speed higher than the allowed limit. Whether it's for cars or trucks, the rule is the same. Maybe the limits are different but we all have to respect them.
I don't know at what speed the truck was overtaking but overtaking is okay if there are no oncoming vehicles in the immediate vicinity.
In my opinion you could have waited before moving into the oncoming lane to overtake because you couldn't see the oncoming traffic on the other side (because you already had a truck ahead of you which was overtaking and blocking your visibility) so... after the truck had completed the overtaking, if there were no other oncoming vehicles, you could have overtaken.
Secondly... You were right not to overtake and I guess you noticed from the navigator that a skoda was arriving. The truck behind you would have to slow down to get you back into your proper lane though. Instead he accelerated to pass you and this is wrong.However, I advise you never to go behind a truck that is already overtaking because if the truck in front of you in overtaking fails to complete in time, you too will have an accident. Or if the truck stops overtaking and you immediately find another truck in front of you coming from the opposite direction... You wouldn't have time to get back into the lane keeping your distance from the truck you passed.
Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
Hello @NateDoggNZ,
First of all thank you for taking the time to ask this question.
Usually sometimes I don't prefer to change trucks because I would like to at least reach 300000 km with a truck and I have not yet succeeded because maybe I have often changed trucks
. I don't have a mileage limit for each truck I've changed. It depends... when I got tired of driving a truck, I take an other truck.
Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
@Somehow Lucky Some points you said are right and I agree with you.
Especially on the C-D road in the Sim 1 server, they should modify it as if it became a highway with two lanes in each direction in my opinion. It would create less danger for players to overtake with reckless driving and also keep a traffic divider in the middle of the 4 lanes.
To give you an example it would be better if the C-D road became like the road in Calais when you exit the motorway after the intersection with the traffic lights.
Then for bans, until they become permanent after a certain limit, nothing will improve for reckless player punishments.
Maybe at the 5th ban that a player has, he should be banned PERMANENTLY.
Otherwise you can change or modify anything on the roads, but that will forever remain a reckless player everywhere in the game. You can change the name of a server, change lanes of roads, change the way you enter a city with multiple lanes... But NOTHING WILL CHANGE for reckless players. They are and will remain reckless players.
So... These are my suggestions:
1) Add more lanes on the C-D road.
2) Apply the permanent ban to a player who has committed 5 violations (After the 5th ban).
-
Hello @Somehow Lucky,
It might be a good idea but I only see a positive side to be able to have fewer incidents of that player in the most populated server in the game (simulator 1).
This idea of yours seems as if a person should take a driver's license before entering to play.
Positive point:
- Have less chance of accidents for that player who has committed infractions in the past hoping that with the test he behaves better while driving.
Negative points:
1) It would take a lot more moderators to make this happen because there are many players banned for violating the rules on the game and I don't think it's a small problem to solve or create a separate role that deals only with these tests (but there is need more people hired).
2) Even if a player passes the test, no one can say if after entering the simulation 1 server, that offender does not violate other rules.
Often even in real life, people get their driver's license driving correctly at that time at the driving school. After they get the driver's license that teaches them how to behave on the road with the road rules... They drive recklessly. Unfortunately I have seen many even in real life. So imagine yourself in a game.
Even if it was something automatic without the need for physical persons for this test...
What gives you confidence that after passing the tests, the person will drive correctly? If it were to happen again, what would all this have been for?
Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
1
-
-
Hello truckers!
What bothers you the most in drive of players on truckersmp?
For example, I am very annoyed by people who overtake when they see that it is impossible to re-enter before creating a collision with other players (either coming from the opposite direction or against the player who is overtaken).
Another thing that annoys me is when people exceed the speed limit and don't understand the dangers.
There are other things that bother me but I'm not going to list them all.
Thanks for your answer.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
1
-
-
Ok @Golden Monkey. But a player open a report. If then according to the moderator it is not a violation to ban the violator of the rule, I do not think there is any fault of the player who opens the report.
The limit may not have decreased.
-
12 hours ago, Deadwilk said:
i use /fix and continue driving
Thanks for your reply though I meant to say as an accident of a truck overturning on the game.
-
1
-
-
On 6/28/2023 at 9:45 PM, CiRaz said:
Some people know this issues, other people are experiencing it right now.
You want to report other players on the TruckersMP Website but the report summary tells you the following:
„You can create 0 more reports, your limit is 0“.
My nickname is CiRaz.
I am 19 years old and an old Euro Truck Simulator 2 Veteran, who play’s TruckersMP, whenever I find the time for it.
With this topic I want to suggest that instead of blocking players forever from reporting other players on the website, because they spammed the report system with useless reports, they could just be blocked temporarily.
Another way to solve this could be that if the amount of accepted reports is by a bit greater than the declined reports, players get numbers added back to the amount of reports they can create.
In my opinion, blocking people from doing certain things should never be decided by an algorithm and especially not without the ability to manually or automatically unblock them after a certain time.
Hello @CiRaz,
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this topic.
In my opinion there should not exist to have 0 reports that you can to send on the site.
I say this because there are moderators who before becoming one had an internship as "Game moderator Trainee" and know the rules well. After all, the last word and the decision is the moderator in charge of evaluating a report.
If there is a violation of that player, then a ban could occur against the infringing user, otherwise the report could be refused but without decreasing the limit of reports.
And if you believe that the moderator's decision has not been evaluated correctly, open feedback on the website.
It seems to me pointless that the limit of reports is lowered up to even 0.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, Almira xeltz. said:
I believe that new regulations will come.
I hope it
.
What new regulations do you think will come?
-
2 hours ago, BoscoHeavyHaul said:
I think the event/dev team have been sleeping, I have seen a mere 4 construction vehicles after driving the road for an entire week so either they are asleep or they just aren’t bothered
I understand. But if the deadline was until July 2, today that is July 3 they should lead the way and show us all the work that has been done in a month.
The situation has already been quite difficult with traffic near Calais in a month.
It would not be right to extend the expiry date by keeping lanes closed on the motorway in Calais.
3 hours ago, artisan15 said:Yeah, is there any exact date where this barriers are getting removed ?
I wonder too.
-
1
-
-
34 minutes ago, [MCG] RedWolf [CZ] ~ said:
Hello there bigfaan @Almira xeltz.,
I would not say it's not a good point. However, I know where is the problem of causing thus kind of congestion. Do you know too?
The main problem of everything happened on the photo above is that many of the players don't respect the rules, and that's a point we are looking for. If they follow the rules it will not happened. As next imagine you are comming through c-d and you would like to come Fuel statiom but it seems to be full, what will you do? Will you try to get there and wont respect the rules or you would rather go and stop the next fuel station?
I think, that second one is correct
Have a good day
Regards,
RedWolf [CZ]
TruckersMP Veteran Driver IV I MCG Driver
Hey mate bigfaan @[MCG] RedWolf [CZ] ~,
Sorry but... If I can participate in answering your question too, I would say that it is always better to check the fuel before traveling. Before leaving to make a journey, I always check the fuel and the kilometers to be covered if the fuel is enough. In case I have to stop at the service area, I prefer where I do not create problems for other players.
I prefer not to stop in those areas.
Sincerely,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
-
1 hour ago, Almira xeltz. said:
Hello everyone.
We all experience these situations, mostly during server peak hours.
Wouldn't it be good for all of us if alternative new petrol station parking spaces were added to avoid these situations?
In such cases, players feel justified and block the road in a random way
Friends who see this, please do not park in such places with double trailers. the road is already narrow
Hey mate @Almira xeltz.,
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this topic.
I completely agree with you and I think what you said is a fundamental thing.
I have often found myself in these situations on the busy road such as C-D or in the city of Calais.
Often people who want to enter the service area in question on the C-D road, block both carriageways knowing that there are already many players within the service area.
It would be a very good idea to be able to implement more space in that area in my opinion.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player
Time Increase Needed for Lights
in Rejected
Posted
Hello @Dharmik,
First of all thank you for taking the time to write this suggestion.
I think it's okay for it to be 15 seconds because the lights in the truck are very important when they need to be turned on. If you are traveling at night and the engine fails to the truck, you should do the F7 command in case the truck engine does not work. It would be very important for the safety of everyone else, besides your own safety.
Increasing the time not to be kicked by the server because of the lights off, is not a good idea, so my answer is no
.
Kind Regards,
ROMANISTA [ITA]
TruckersMP Veteran Player