UnknownAX

Damn, all I see is please use the correct formatting 24/7, lighten up a bit. On the ideas which are good they're just like boom headshot rejected. I don't understand how people moderator and keep posting follow correct formatting yet there are about three pages of ban reports to be completed. What the OP has suggested is a very good idea, but unfortunately it most likely won't happen. I don't think we need a system as such, I think we just need a better set of guidelines for these "moderators" to follow. Treat others how you want to be treated, which should be equally and fairly.

The OP has highlighted the following points which seems to have been ignored by multiple users. Can someone remove his information from the servers, eg; Steam information. Rather than ignore the question, state he must talk to a developer. Why isn't a strike system? Everyone seems to focus on the fact he's used speedhacking and nothing else. Why do most people in power only read one line of a whole post rather than replying to the entire thing?

'Normal users' good way to differentiate between staff and us. I don't see why everyone can't have a colour. Example, red for admins, green for moderators and blue for members of the community. Doubt any of this will happen, in the PM i sent the CM's and Devs, they didn't seem to care two hoots. If I had the the opportunity I'd make this community feel as one and add features which would make it more enjoyable. Before anyone says staff are selected, I know that. Ask Truckdriver what he thinks of me and the PM's I've sent to the CMs/Devs if I'm worthy.

I made a topic on this to gauge users feedback, I think it's required and needed. I also put this idea among others directly in a PM to the developers and CM's, Unfortunately it fell on deaf ears.

I'm all for that idea as well, which is why I have started to do it. I just don't agree with the statement above where unless you've got evidence your guilty. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

That doesn't happen in real life so why should it happen here, the police have to provide evidence to convict you. I don't think we should use the approach your guilty unless you can prove your innocence. I think it should be the admin has to have evidence that the user was committing a crime/problem to warrant a ban/kick. Please note, this doesn't have to be recording everything, it can be photographic/text evidence. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

Hi, Not to sound like an arse, I think it's completely fair to ask for evidence. In real life they wouldn't lock you up without evidence. I believe in a fair system, and before someone says it's just a trucking simulator, that's besides the point. ~ UnknownAX.

Unfortunately there is a time sync difference, I'm not sure why but time on multiplayer is slower than single player. Which means your drivers don't earn as much, I'm not sure if this can or will be fixed. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

I have an iMac, in all honestly I would use bootcamp to install windows on another partition. So then you have Mac and Windows running. I hate using VMWare/Crossover as I always find it's clucky and causes more lag. i hope this helps you , if you need anymore help please don't hesitate to PM me. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

That's rather odd Jadenn. Does the main website login with the same details? P.S Message me your steam username, I'd like to have a convoy with you one day , and discuss a few things.

Hi, When your game crashes do you get the message saying do you want to send a log to the developers? I believe Clark a moderator made a posted a thread something similar to this. I'd post a link but can't seem to find it again. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

I agree with this and I have also suggested this to some admins in a PM. I feel that if one admin has banned the user, it should then be down to another admin to view the users appeal so it's completely independent and the user has a fair trial. For example, if a police officer arrests someone, then the evidence is gathered and they're taken to court. A judge will then look at the evidence and convict the user, the same goes for an appeal. What I'm saying we should do is if a user appeals a completely independent admin will look at the evidence and make a decision on the users ban. Kind Regards ~ UnknownAX

I think you meant to say we already have a feature on the forums built in where you can report a post/topic. A week ban is a little lengthy just for talking about a limiter. Could you please edit your post, you've quoted the user who used harsh language unfortunately the quote still has the foul language in. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

I'm not stating that all of you don't care, just a few. I think a few are only here for the chance to have a few more commands as their power hungry? There's a few staff members who I don't exactly see do an awful lot. At the end of the day I don't want to be saying negative things about members of staff but it's how I feel and how a few members I've spoken to feel. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

Please don't tell me 5 members of staff are that busy that they can't reply when they've had over 24 hours. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

I didn't misunderstand you, I was just highlighting if I feel an admin isn't performing or if I don't agree with a decision I'll air my opinion. While I did say I agree each case is unique, they should show some control and not go power mad by banning someone for stupid amount of time because they have the username Putin. Let's be completely honest how many moderators or admins actually give a damn about the community? I've sent a few messages to senior members of staff and unfortunately not many of them seem too fussed at all with what I'm suggesting, I haven't even received a reply back from some of the highest ranking staff. Plus don't say they're busy because they've read it multiple times. Regards, ~ UnknownAX

Unfortunately I beg to differ from what I've seen. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

I'm entitled to criticise the admins if I feel, everyone is entitled to voice their opinion. While what you say is true each case is unique, there should be a guide that they follow. A few examples have been given where one who blocks / trolls for 20 minutes gets kicked where as a user who blocked for one minute gets banned for a few hours. I believe if a user is banned, they must also have a fair appeal, and that the same admin/mod shouldn't be the judge who says denied. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

The thing is, if there isn't any guidelines then a user who blocks may get a two hour ban by a mod and another mod may ban someone who has done far less such as foul language may get a day ban. In my opinion there should be guidelines, while each situation is different the main problems are the same, such as blocking, ramming, swearing, abuse etc. Moderators will then have to respond appropriately but will have a clear guideline so they know what is expected from them and what fair. I also think users should be given a chance, the more times they're found guilty of committing an offensive then the longer they should be banned. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

Hi, Please can you elaborate on why you think it'll cause more problems? Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

Exactly, there may even be a set of guidelines which they currently have to follow who knows. Maybe a moderator could elaborate on if there is any guidelines they have to follow when choosing the time period a ban should be over, or if it's up to how the moderator feels. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.

I think what your saying is there needs to be a set of guidelines the admins must follow. Eg, if a guy blocks a road on purpose 2 hour ban for example. If someone advertises another server perm? This way admins have something they can follow rather than all of these bans which aren't really appropriate for the crime committed. Regards, ~ UnknownAX.