Cal_

// Rejected

Hello @Neeraj287, Thank you for your suggestion. As you have failed to edit your original suggestion with the correct formatting. I will go ahead and reject this suggestion. Please ensure that in the future, you edit your suggestion with the required formatting to avoid getting the suggestion rejected before others can comment/review. Once again, thank you for your suggestion.

Hi there! Thank you for taking the time to create this suggestion. We have taken a look at it and determined that it is best suited for the games developers SCS. Feel free to suggest it on their forums.

// Rejected

Hello @Aywen8oh, Thank you for your suggestion and following the required formatting. We have had many suggestions internally about the §1.5 rule. I can assure you that our Game Moderation Management are aware and currently working on reworking the rule, as well as the punishment system. We do not have an ETA as to when this will be implemented. However, the team are aware and reviewing the full rule itself with our Project Management. I will go ahead and reject this suggestion as we are already aware that a lot of our players would like this changed. Once again, thank you for your suggestion.

Hello @lIIlIlllIlIlIIlIlIlIlII, Thank you for your suggestion. I would just like to confirm that we are aware of this being outstanding and we are going to be looking at getting this completed relatively soon. Event Management are aware and have made sure that they make a note of this on their lists. Once again, thank you for your suggestion and we apologise for the wait. This suggestion remains to be on-hold.

Hello @ash.exe, Thank you for your suggestion. I would just like to confirm that we are aware of this being outstanding and we are going to be looking at getting this completed relatively soon. Event Management are aware and have made sure that they make a note of this on their lists. Once again, thank you for your suggestion and we apologise for the wait. This suggestion remains to be on-hold.

// On Hold

Hello @Chema02, Thank you for your suggestion. After speaking with the Event Management, we have decided to place this on-hold. They are going to be looking at overhauling the DOS we use in-game, therefore, we will place this on hold and review at a later date. Once again, thank you for your suggestion. We apologise for the long delay for an update.

// Rejected

Hello @i_am_marcelek, Thank you for your suggestion. I have reviewed your suggestion in great detail and can identify that your suggestion is in relation to reworks to Calais/Duisburg and/or the C-D road. At this current time, we are not going to be moving forward with any suggestions in relation to the mentioned relations. The reason for this is due to the fact we are awaiting for the SCS Benelux rework that we will be supporting when it releases. Therefore, at this current time I will be rejecting your suggestion. The Game Moderation Managers have recently made changes using DOS (Objects) to rework the way-of-working at Calais and along the C-D road, including the Calais intersection. Once again, thank you for your suggestion.

Hello @Neeraj287, Could you please edit your suggestion in the format outlined here: https://forum.truckersmp.com/index.php?/announcement/234-read-before-posting-a-suggestion/ We’ll give you 48 hours to make the changes. Thanks!

// Rejected

Hello @Aywen8oh, Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, the team reviewed a suggestion like this (see below) and was rejected due to the amount of times the command would be abuse. Therefore, we are not looking at implementing this at this current time. Please ensure that in the future, you follow the required formatting outlined here: https://forum.truckersmp.com/index.php?/announcement/234-read-before-posting-a-suggestion/ I will go ahead and reject this suggestion. Once again, thank you for your suggestion.