[Limit the Heavy cargos and Doubles trailers to EU1]

I think this is a bad idea as i enjoy using the new Heavy cargo trailers and i dont enjoy playing on eu2 due to the small amount of players

[Banning system]

@Faern Very well said thanks for support.

 

 

@scarface0359 The system can also be used to help with selecting admins by checking the success rate of the applicant.

They would also have a better understaning on what to look for when doing reports in game as they will have experience from the community based system.

 

[Banning system]

well because the reports will be assigned randomly across all the users signed up to the system then then the chances are that it will not just be people from the same VTC.

17 minutes ago, FirestarteR93 said:

Q :What about VTCs - what if they gang up and start approving bans just cuz they don't like the reported person or want to troll them?

@coolbub123 The problem is that the offender's name will be in the evidence if it is video...

Thanks for the thought tho

3 minutes ago, coolbub123 said:

make the reports given to a player by random (choice of 1 in each category) don't include the offender's name but just what they were reported for (ramming, trolling etc.).

[Banning system]

@Batslav This is just an initial idea but i understand your point on getting 5 people

 

[Banning system]

The reports i have made before that have been completed took about 6 days and they was done last year.

The reports seem to take longer now than they did this time last year as i have 1 report that i am still waiting for a admin to claim and i made it on the 17th Jul...

 

This time to me does not seem acceptable because it means that there is people driving around destroying the game for others...

 

@RJLakey thanks for the support!

 

9 hours ago, RJLakey said:

Brilliant Idea, Out of the number of reports I've placed only three of them have been dealt with and they were all breaking the rules with evidence via youtube videos, Im more than sure this isnt just the case for me either. Makes me wish this system was in place already.

 

@Joao Rodrigues The point in this idea is that the admins dont need to ban players but the community will...

 

So when a report is made instead of it being sent to the admins it will get sent to 4 random players and they decide if they are guilty.

 

The only need for an admin in this system is when a ban appeal is made.

 

6 hours ago, Joao Rodrigues said:

It must always be possible to file an appeal, no matter how many jurors find somebody guilty.

As the appeal has to checked by an admin, I do not see the big relief of work for them and consequently no faster processing of reports.

[Banning system]

@Erael Yes it is like overwatch just better as it will have trucks...

 

[Banning system]

31 minutes ago, Smalley - Truckers.FM said:

.....

I think i should have said in the post a bit better but the players voting to ban the player wont pick the report it will be assigned to them.

i can also understand your concerns but the i am thinking that players will have to sign up to use the system so admins get a say in who is allowed to use it as well

 

29 minutes ago, Anriandor said:

......

Yes my idea is like CS:GO overwatch

[Banning system]

^

Is that better now?

[Banning system]

A fitting title: Community Banning System

A description of what the suggestion is about :

Community Banning System

I have notice recently that the new report system is basically useless due to the majority of them timing out and when making reports on the website it takes an extremely long time for an admin to claim the report. This is where i thought why not change the websites system...

 

How should it work

Spoiler

So the current way of making reports on the website will stay the same, however when the report has been made it will be sent to a couple (about 4) eligible signed up players. The players will all watch the clip and review other evidence that has been uploaded like an admin normally would do. At the end of reviewing the players investigating will submit a verdict and also write a basic optional summery.

 

If 2 players say that they have not broken a rule and the other 2 say that they have then it will be sent to one more player that will decide.

 

 

 

What will stop people abusing the system?

Spoiler

There will be a player reputation system. This system will score players when they complete a report, if the majority agree with you then you will gain a positive reputation. If the majority disagree with you then you will lose reputation.

If a player gets a negative reputation then the player will no longer be able to use the system!

 

What happens if someone is banned and did not break a rule?

Spoiler

If someone gets banned for something that they did not do then they can makes ban appeal. Ban appeals will only be able to be done by admins.

An admin will then review all the evidence that there is and submit a verdict. If they agree that the ban was invalid then the players that got them banned will lose reputation and the ban will be removed.

 

What makes a player eligible?

• They are not the person being reported.
• Has a min of 100Hrs in ets2/ATS.
• They are not the person issuing the report.
• They have to be enrolled on the Banning system program.
• They have a positive or neutral reputation.

 

Any eventual example images or similar: NONE

A reason why it should be added/removed/change: It should be added as it means that there is a shorter wait time for players to get banned through the website as the admins don't seem to be coping with the current system that is in place.

[depriving Clarkinator[1873] from admin]

i and my friend think that this admin should be deprived from his rank due to the fact he just kicks people randomly. Istoped to get directions from the map but bythe time i finished i was kicked in the time of 15 secionds i was kicked, i was not blocking the road at i all, i puled to the side out of the way and put my hazord lights on.