-
Posts
11 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Sparky_Sct
-
-
@smokywarfame No one expects any kind of devs to disclose everything they are doing, but I don't think we have any idea what they are doing. Are they working on MP features? Are they trying to add more to the MP? It doesn't seem to me like we know anything at all.
-
1 hour ago, Mirrland said:
TruckersMP will also need licencing from Ford in order to use the Crown Victoria.
Also, please use the search function:
I did, and that thread you linked is irrelevant to this topic. I am suggesting a replacement, not addition. And no they would not need licencing because TMP is a community project.
1 hour ago, smokywarfame said:It's not the case that they can just push a button so the design and visual characteristics of the car changes, it will again take a lot of time to get this implemented.
Well, apart from bug fixes I haven't see the TMP dev team doing much. So what else is it that they are doing that takes priority over ATSMP's immersion?
-
But that's the point because they already added a car to it it wouldn't take anywhere near as much effort to change the car.
-
Suggestion Name: Replace the Scout with a Ford Crown Victoria (P71 Interceptor).
Suggestion Description: If TMP were to just switch out the Scout with the Crown Vic it wouldn't be that difficult, just swap the model tweak some of the code for the car and change the name and sounds.
Any example images (the California Police Livery):
Why should it be added?: The Scout doesn't fit in ATS at all and the police variant sticks out the most. It would be a really nice change for ATSMP.
- 1
Replace the Scout in ATSMP with Ford Crown Vic (P71)
in Rejected
Posted
But you can see why when I make a suggestion and then people are like "oh no that takes way too much time" then I ask ok so what are they doing instead but then people are like well we don't know. For all we know they could be doing f**k all. (I think it's pretty safe to say that's not the case, but you get my drift.)
Reply to a suggestion with sorry we are spending time on x, x and x we don't have the time/resources to do that is much better than oh no that will take time to do.