Jump to content

Lamb Sauce III

Game Moderator
 TruckersMP Profile
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Lamb Sauce III

    Christmas

    in Archive

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Bеаn said:

    it was Christmas, so I was celebrating that. With food, gifts and family. What about you, Lamb?

    I strangely ended up doing the same thing. Even ended up watching a film, didn't really pay any attention though 😱

    Just now, L-DR@GO said:

    Well, I was indoors all through.

    But am planning on traveling

    I will he going to the village January 

    Ah what village?

    Exploring the New Chat System

    in News Archive

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Almira xeltz. said:


    It can be a more violent action to stimulate the player. to make him correct himself. Simple

    Still extremely pointless and unneeded. Most people don't care what you say becaue they know that 95% of the time nothings gonna happen 

    New Ban System

    in Rejected

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Bеаn said:

     

    Initial Reaction

     

    The first three bans have lengths determined by a moderator's discretion and internal ban guidelines — a structure I believe should remain unchanged. A one-month duration for a 4th active ban appears adequate; again, there seems to be no compelling reason to alter this. You haven't addressed 5th bans, which is where much of the controversy lies. In the past, aligned with the "Road to Simulation" ideology and generally stringent ban guidelines, the 5th ban resulted in a permanent ban. However, this type of indefinite ban was removed as part of an effort to adopt a more lenient approach.

    Should you be considering a return to stricter ban enforcement, I recommend focusing your proposed revisions on the 5th ban instead of unnecessarily tampering with the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th bans.

    A ban should be considered a last resort, when all other means of punishment are not applicable or deemed too lenient. Bans shouldn't be handed out willy-nilly. 

    How the community feels

    Pay attention to the community, as they believe that the number of bans issued for trivial incidents should be reduced, and this adjustment has been made. There's also positive support that ban durations are "generally reasonable." Only a total of 31% of participants felt that ban durations were not "generally reasonable." Some of these participants probably believe that ban durations are too long and not too short, further diminishing support for longer ban lengths.

    31% of participants agree with the statement "Ban durations are generally reasonable".
    21% of participants neither agree nor disagree with the statement "Ban durations are generally reasonable".
    18% of participants fully agree with the statement "Ban durations are generally reasonable".
    18% of participants disagree with the statement "Ban durations are generarlly reasonable".
    13% of participants fully disagree with the statement "Ban durations are generally reasonable". 


    There are more participants in support of the statement than there are opposing it. Therefore, I would say that the general consensus is that people feel that ban durations are generally reasonable. There is a number of participants who are "on the fence"; these participants don't feel that ban durations are generally reasonable, but they also do not disagree that ban durations are generally reasonable.  

    eVbAHWV.png
    taken from Project Update: Back to Basics

    Conclusion

     

    I don't see a need to modify the system, especially not to make it stricter. I believe the current system is appropriate and satisfactory. I don't think I'm alone in holding this view, given the community feedback shared above.

    100%. The majority of the community are clearly happy with the way things are, therefore the ban lengths do not need to be changed. Only the duration of the 5th ban may be one that could cause controversy, although I don't see any need to alter it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.