0.2.2.6.0 Released

[Guest]

4 hours ago, techwhipped said:

Queridos Reclamantes,

 

Debería estar agradecido de que TruckersMP haya creado un mod gratuito para que lo usemos para disfrutar del modo multijugador con Friends / Family. Estoy muy agradecido con el personal de TruckersMP que trabajan muy duro de forma gratuita en lugar de responder a los tickets de soporte, tratar con las apelaciones de prohibición, mantener la discordia / foro limpios y mantener actualizado a los camioneros. Como programador, no solo con presionar un botón, todo funciona. Todo se hace probando un error con las actualizaciones recientes de ATS / ETS. Se agregaron muchos cambios al agregar nuevo DLC, New Trailers y ETC. En lugar de quejarse e insultar al personal de TruckersMP, debería agradecerles. Honestamente, imagine que si la comunidad de TruckersMP no existiera en absoluto, probablemente todos estaríamos jugando para un solo jugador.

 

Gracias,

Robert

dear friend truckmp is a business and as such there are some income and expenses, when they decided to make a multiplayer of the euro truck simulator 2 is for there is money in between, listen well: no one, individually nobody makes a monthly investment in paying monimas, servers. ... for the love of art, I hope it is clear to you, and by the way, if you want to be given a DLC, see another excuse, greeting

[Ghostprotocol[NL]]

9 hours ago, Extremadura said:

I am very calm, in fact I have not said anything against truckmp, I only complain about people like you who only know nonsense, if you shut up it would be better for the whole community, with your comments that they have a life, that they do everything for free .......

uhm, i think you quote the wrong message, because i was not replying to you xd

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Ghostprotocol[NL] said:

uhm, creo que citas el mensaje incorrecto, porque no te estaba respondiendo xd

 

1 hour ago, Ghostprotocol[NL] said:

uhm, creo que citas el mensaje incorrecto, porque no te estaba respondiendo xd

I apologize for my mistake, a warm greeting

[_CeE]

On 6/14/2019 at 11:41 AM, Aves said:

Calm guys.  Because TMP has dx9, must wait to updated new dx11..

You are wrong bro, tht client has nothing to do with dx11, its only a client tht connects you to the servers..i can use dx11 and u can use dx9 and tht doesn't affect the client at all cz those 2 are pc based. Thing is tmp is supposed to update us about whats happening cz the more they keep quiet, the more people will keep on asking. 

[Manu_Bela]

blá blá blá... I want a solution.

[Aves]

Dude, mwl4 said that still crash with dx11

Its polish languange, but u can see picture

[Tauno]

DirectX 11 is holding back upgrade

[peynaple]

DX11 doesn't properly work in 1.34

It works perfectly in 1.35

I hope that they update the mod soon

[Ghostprotocol[NL]]

On 6/16/2019 at 10:39 AM, Extremadura said:

 

I apologize for my mistake, a warm greeting

no problem mate! Drive safe!

[dibam83]

Thank you

[MeanJT]

This is that time we go though every time the game updates. We just need to wait and let them work on it. They'll get it done. They always do.

[I brake for cake]

You're more than welcome to go away and make your own multiplayer mod, seeing as how you think it's easy.

Edited June 17, 2019 by JJay

[I brake for cake]

You can't even play at the moment anyway, you're banned for the next 11 days 

Edited June 17, 2019 by JJay

[McDodge34 [FR QC]]

Just curious why they want to integrate support of DX11 if its not a mandatory requirement, my modo is simple, if it works fine in DX9. why try DX11, I tried the game in DX11 and didn't see any changes at all, same overall fps in DX9 or DX11, plus if we're forced to play in DX11, I'm fairly sure a lot of players with Potato PC will soon invade the forums asking for DX9 support, correct me if I'm wrong here, but both DX9 and DX11 are incompatible between each other

 

Not complaining here, but it looks a lot more complicated than I expected.

[dragonslayingmaster1000]

34 minutes ago, McDodge34 [FR QC] said:

Just curious why they want to integrate support of DX11 if its not a mandatory requirement, my modo is simple, if it works fine in DX9. why try DX11, I tried the game in DX11 and didn't see any changes at all, same overall fps in DX9 or DX11, plus if we're forced to play in DX11, I'm fairly sure a lot of players with Potato PC will soon invade the forums asking for DX9 support, correct me if I'm wrong here, but both DX9 and DX11 are incompatible between each other

 

Not complaining here, but it looks a lot more complicated than I expected.

You don't have to use dx 11 if you don't want to. It's not a mandatory option and it's just experimental.

[McDodge34 [FR QC]]

10 minutes ago, dragonslayingmaster1000 said:

You don't have to use dx 11 if you don't want to. It's not a mandatory option and it's just experimental.

Ok, then, but if the TruckersMP is using DX11, everyone will have to use it to be able to see everyone on the map, on the road and all the GUI addons provided by TMP, or there's some things I don't understand about DX exactly.

[crazyace2016]

dx11 is graphical smoothness better fps you will see the same thing under dx9 as you would with dx11

[McDodge34 [FR QC]]

I had the impression that DX9 and DX11 where different graphic engines, maybe I was wrong.

[crazyace2016]

if I'm wrong ill be the first to admit it. for example gta 5 on pc uses rage engine. but it uses directx as well that's why I feel directx helps in fps, smoother texture more realistic rendering.

[Tangle]

3 hours ago, McDodge34 [FR QC] said:

I had the impression that DX9 and DX11 where different graphic engines, maybe I was wrong.

 

2 hours ago, crazyace2016 said:

if I'm wrong ill be the first to admit it. for example gta 5 on pc uses rage engine. but it uses directx as well that's why I feel directx helps in fps, smoother texture more realistic rendering.

 

To clarify for the both of you, DirectX is a graphical API, not a graphical engine. OpenGL and Vulkan are the other popular graphical APIs. I'll explain it more simply in a second, but the technical explanation is that they're the methods via which a GPU can be sent commands and data that tell it how to render a scene. A given GPU has to support the API in order for it to work. DX9, DX10, DX11, DX12, OpenGL and Vulkan all work differently, but can mostly be used to achieve the same results, albeit they're usually better at it the newer the API is.

 

Let's try explaining it... like trying to make a picture on a piece of paper. If you want a replica of the Mona Lisa on a piece of paper, there's so many ways to make that, just like there's so many APIs. You could use a super nice printer, you could use an old printer that's kind of slow, you could have someone screenprint it, or you could even have someone draw it by hand with color pencils and pens. We've had paper and color pencils basically forever, just like DX9, and you could get a very good replica of the Mona Lisa... but it would take FOREVER for someone to do that. If you wanted it done faster, then it'd probably look more like a sketch of the picture, if you had a good enough artist. That artist is like DX9.

 

DX11 is more like a really nice printer. It can do the same job way faster, but it can also do a much better job faster too. It can print a replica of the Mona Lisa in seconds, and if you had a good artist do it with pencils and compare them side by side, they might look the same. But if you told the artist and the printer to do it in the same amount of time, the artist's picture would look much worse. That's what the difference between DX9 and DX11 is, but obviously less extreme. An API is like the final process that makes the picture.

 

A rendering engine is different. Think of it like the way you tell someone or something to make the picture. If you want to tell an artist how to draw the Mona Lisa, you could try describing it, or you could show them it on your phone, or a really nice monitor, or show them a different printout of it. If you wanted to tell the printer how to print it, you could use pretty much any computer, any OS, even a phone. You could have it connected over USB, or ethernet, or wireless. You could print from a web browser, or an image saved on your computer, or email or whatever. The engine is what decides how to make the image, the API is what it uses to make it.

 

That being said, all of this only happens on the computer the game is being played on. If a game engine knows how to render using DX9, OpenGL AND DX11, like this game does, it doesn't matter which it's using, the engine is still using the API to make the same image. No matter which API is in use, the engine still uses the same data to tell the API to make an image. Whether or not you see another truck is not dependent on which API you nor they are using. Their computer is making the image however it can, and yours is making it however it can too. If a game engine made certain things visible under one API and invisible under another, that'd be really bad, and the API where things were invisible would be unusable.

 

The reason all this matters for TruckersMP is because the mod has to know how to use the same API that the game is using in order to show its own HUD and menus and stuff. It has to draw on the image the same way the game is set to draw its image. If DX11 wasn't supported in MP in the next update, then you wouldn't see any of the MP text or menus when you loaded the game in DX11. That's all. Of course, making MP use a new API is just as hard as it was for SCS to make their game engine use a new API. That's the proper explanation.

 

Edit: As a side note, the mod currently supports DX9 and OGL. They didn't have to add OpenGL support, but they did. They could have told everyone who wanted to play the mod to use DX9, but they didn't. I'm sure they'll support DX11 as soon as possible, especially since it's that much faster and better than DX9 and GL.

[Scotty2K]

Super Excited.

[Manu_Bela]

As Tangle said: 

 "The reason all this matters for TruckersMP is because the mod has to know how to use the same API that the game is using in order to show its own HUD and menus and stuff. It has to draw on the image the same way the game is set to draw its image. If DX11 wasn't supported in MP in the next update, then you wouldn't see any of the MP text or menus when you loaded the game in DX11. That's all. Of course, making MP use a new API is just as hard as it was for SCS to make their game engine use a new API. That's the proper explanation".

That simple!!!

[Guest G1nge_UK]

6 hours ago, Tangle said:

 

 

The description of the differences between dx9 and 11 (edited to save space)

 

Thats a really good analogy  

[_CeE]

2 hours ago, Mineiro Uai said:

As Tangle said: 

 "The reason all this matters for TruckersMP is because the mod has to know how to use the same API that the game is using in order to show its own HUD and menus and stuff. It has to draw on the image the same way the game is set to draw its image. If DX11 wasn't supported in MP in the next update, then you wouldn't see any of the MP text or menus when you loaded the game in DX11. That's all. Of course, making MP use a new API is just as hard as it was for SCS to make their game engine use a new API. That's the proper explanation".

That simple!!!

But y cant he just make it wrk with dx9 for now whilst working on dx11

 

[Simeta]

16 minutes ago, CeEG89 said:

But y cant he just make it wrk with dx9 for now whilst working on dx11

 

Because its easier to do it all in one update. Otherwise they would of patched ETS2 and ATS separately.