Handling suggestions differently

[myluki2000]

Suggestion Name: Handle suggestions better / differently

 

Problem 1

Description: I've seen it 2 times now, might've been more often: Admins not reading the full suggestion and just closing the topic by rating the topic by title.

 

I'll analyze these 2 examples now:

 

Example 1: http://forum.ets2mp.com/index.php?/topic/789-longer-yellow-traffic-lights/

 

The OP wanted it, so traffic lights stay yellow longer when changing from green to red. The topic has been closed by Warrior with this message:

 

 

we are not going to change the yellow light during nights, because you have that also in real life 

 

REJECTED

 

A completly different topic. It looks like he judged by the title.

 

 

Example 2: http://forum.ets2mp.com/index.php?/topic/511-non-afk-kick-zones/

 

Same thing as Example 1, admin misunderstood the topic

 

 

Problem 2

Description: When rejecting a suggestion, Admins should give reasons. They often do, but not always. I'm pretty sure when admins would give reasons, the amount of duplicates would go back a bit as well.

 

For example: It has been suggested to make a remember E-Mail & Password option. rootKiller closed it because of security issues. OK, fully understandable. It's bad if someone gets on your account. So later it has been suggested to just remember the E-Mail, because then there wouldn't be any security issues. But that suggestion has been closed without any reason, just saying REJECTED.

 

 

Why should these be added?

I'm pretty sure it's clear why these suggesions should be considered by admins when closing a topic.

 

First suggestion: Closing it without knowing the suggestion just shouldn't happen and lets the admins look bad and as if they don't know what they are doing

 

Second suggestion: I'm pretty sure that if you would give more reasons, the whining and flaming would be much less. This also helps when creating a new suggestion so you know what the admins think about certain ideas.

 

 

IMPORTANT: I'm not trying to be rude to any admin, especially Warrior (example was in a thread he closed).

 

Also I hope this is close enough to the format which should be followed so this doesn't get closed because of "Wrong format"

[[BE/NL] Vice]

I agree. It's kinda like in this topic: http://forum.ets2mp.com/index.php?/topic/511-non-afk-kick-zones/ 

That topic was about changing up the afk kick a bit so that it won't get annoying when waiting for someone for example (by disabling autokick at rest stops or so). It did get 'acepted', but the reasoning behind it was 'In the New update, we have re-enabled the AFK kicking system.', which is not really what that topic was about.

[Crazyforiphone]

I have a feeling if the admin wants to lock it fine but they shouldn't be able to move it only devs should.

[myluki2000]

I agree. It's kinda like in this topic: http://forum.ets2mp.com/index.php?/topic/511-non-afk-kick-zones/ 

That topic was about changing up the afk kick a bit so that it won't get annoying when waiting for someone for example (by disabling autokick at rest stops or so). It did get 'acepted', but the reasoning behind it was 'In the New update, we have re-enabled the AFK kicking system.', which is not really what that topic was about.

 

That was the one i meant. Edited

[[ S.PLH ] Warrior]

I have a feeling if the admin wants to lock it fine but they shouldn't be able to move it only devs should.

 

i have permission to move the suggestion threats and i always ask rootkiller first and then i react 

since i find this good idea and its mainly mine problem 

 

i will accept it 

[HumaneWolf]

Suggestions are handled by those who decide what should be implemented now, so managers, devs, webdevs.