Jump to content

PallePuh

Veteran Driver II
 TruckersMP Profile
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About PallePuh

  • Birthday March 21

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Sweden
  • Interests
    Computers, games, animals, driving
  • Preferred Trucks
    Freightliner Cascadia®
    Mack
    Scania
    Volvo
    Western Star
  • American Garage Location
    Colorado: Colorado Springs
  • EU Garage Location
    Sweden: Örebro
  • Known languages
    Swedish, English

TruckersMP Information

External Websites

Recent Profile Visitors

1,534 profile views

PallePuh's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (4/13)

  • Popular
  • Discussionist
  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

145

Reputation

  1. Hi there, I found you here too! :woah:

    I'm late to the party, but congratz to Events Team 🙌:mlg_doge:

  2. Last month of the year. So the most important question of the decade. Is it okay to listen to Christmas music already?
  3. I can see what you mean with it being annoying with them going so slow. And maybe having a slow acceleration. But forbidding stuff? I don't think that's the right way to go. Calais to Duisburg is a public road where everyone can go. We should not prohibit people from driving there just to give others priority. That's not fair. Also, it's a truck simulator, not a racing game. Even in real life, sometimes there are trucks in front of you, or tractors or whatever slow-going vehicles. Do we wish to ban them? Well, no, not really. Sometimes we need to have ice in our stomachs and not be in such a rush. Even more so in a game, where you don't have something important to go to.
  4. Noo, not Spoony 🥄😢

     

    Take care, hopefully see you back on the team later ❤️🙌

    1. SpoonyUK

      SpoonyUK

      Thanks. You too. I hope we will too♥️

  5. A big community where everyone from around the world can meet and have fun
  6. You're right, it will open up to trolls and that. However, I think it's a tradeoff which might be necessary. And if it opens the doors to trollers, then maybe a problem is in the rules and currently internal guidelines themselves. But I don't believe it's more efficient to define a rule by description of an offence. But it might depend on the interpretation of "efficient". And you talk about that leeway in GMs decision-making, that isn't only good. It can be troublesome. As that will mean more inconsistency. And inconsistency shouldn't be a thing when giving punishments. Everyone should receive the same treatment, not depending on what person. But it's definitely a double ended sword.
  7. I am a believer in that rules are never considered "done", as they can always be improved. So that case is here. The rules are fairly well done in TMP, however there are things I want: Clarification on all §2 rules. To make it clear what is actually prohibited and what's not. I know that the GM team has some internal set of rules and that's fine, but I think it's wrong to hide everything under an internal set of rules. If we could get a better laid out §2, with some internal rules mixed in, it would be good. Im also sure it would reduce the amount of "declined" reports (which would lead to less load on GMs).
  8. Congrats Stan, well deserved 🙌❤️

    1. .Stan

      .Stan

      Thanks PallePuh!

  9. It has been discussed earlier here too I see both sides of the case here, but I do kinda wish there were a bit more reactions allowed
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.